TY - JOUR
T1 - "A Forgotten Instrument of Global Capitalism? International Concessions, 1870-1930"
AU - Veeser, Cyrus
PY - 2013
Y1 - 2013
N2 - From the mid-1800s through the 1930s, concessions were an institutional foundation of modern capitalism about which we have liittle systematic, comparative knowledge. Concessions - contracts given by governments in less-developed states to foreign investors - supplied elements that were lacking in the host country, including a congenial legal order and an attractive investment environment. Cash-poor governments eager to modernize often added special privileges and monopoly rights to concessions in order to attract capital. In Africa and Asia, all the colonial powers granted concessions to promote the building of infrastructure and development of commercial agriculture without burdening the treasury. After providing a global survey of concessions with special attention to Russia, Mexico, the Domnican Republic, and French West Africa, the author concludes that concessions, by their nature, entailed contradictions that made them a ‘third best’ option for political elites eager to incorporate peripheral regions into the world economy.
AB - From the mid-1800s through the 1930s, concessions were an institutional foundation of modern capitalism about which we have liittle systematic, comparative knowledge. Concessions - contracts given by governments in less-developed states to foreign investors - supplied elements that were lacking in the host country, including a congenial legal order and an attractive investment environment. Cash-poor governments eager to modernize often added special privileges and monopoly rights to concessions in order to attract capital. In Africa and Asia, all the colonial powers granted concessions to promote the building of infrastructure and development of commercial agriculture without burdening the treasury. After providing a global survey of concessions with special attention to Russia, Mexico, the Domnican Republic, and French West Africa, the author concludes that concessions, by their nature, entailed contradictions that made them a ‘third best’ option for political elites eager to incorporate peripheral regions into the world economy.
UR - http://www.tandfonline.com/toc/rinh20/current
M3 - Article
VL - 35
SP - 1136
EP - 1155
JO - International History Review
JF - International History Review
IS - 5
ER -