TY - JOUR
T1 - A Telemedicine Opportunity or Distraction?
AU - Gogan, Janis L.
AU - Garfield, Monica
PY - 2012
Y1 - 2012
N2 - This undisguised case, based on field research, describes the Partners TeleStroke service, which enables specialist doctors at Partners’ two Boston teaching hospitals (Massachusetts General Hospital and Brigham & Women’s Hospital, both members of Partners’ Health Care) to provide patient-present acute stroke consultations to generalist doctors at community hospitals. The case supports student discussion of organizational issues in the deployment of innovative networked IT applications for cross-boundary collaboration. The context of use is high urgency: doctors must determine whether to administer a drug which can both save a patient’s life and dramatically reduce post-stroke disability such as paralysis and speech loss. However, the drug, tPA, can be harmful – even deadly – to some patients. Clinical information relevant to this highly consequential decision must be gathered under time pressure, since the patient cannot receive tPA if more than 3-4 hours have passed since the time s/he was last seen well. The case describes the development and current status of TeleStroke. The executive director of this program needs to decide whether and how to respond to a request from a participating hospital. Nurses there have asked him for help in expanding the use of telemedicine applications in which doctors from a variety of clinical specialties – such as critical-care pediatrics – would provide online consultations, compensating for that hospital’s lack of such specialists.
AB - This undisguised case, based on field research, describes the Partners TeleStroke service, which enables specialist doctors at Partners’ two Boston teaching hospitals (Massachusetts General Hospital and Brigham & Women’s Hospital, both members of Partners’ Health Care) to provide patient-present acute stroke consultations to generalist doctors at community hospitals. The case supports student discussion of organizational issues in the deployment of innovative networked IT applications for cross-boundary collaboration. The context of use is high urgency: doctors must determine whether to administer a drug which can both save a patient’s life and dramatically reduce post-stroke disability such as paralysis and speech loss. However, the drug, tPA, can be harmful – even deadly – to some patients. Clinical information relevant to this highly consequential decision must be gathered under time pressure, since the patient cannot receive tPA if more than 3-4 hours have passed since the time s/he was last seen well. The case describes the development and current status of TeleStroke. The executive director of this program needs to decide whether and how to respond to a request from a participating hospital. Nurses there have asked him for help in expanding the use of telemedicine applications in which doctors from a variety of clinical specialties – such as critical-care pediatrics – would provide online consultations, compensating for that hospital’s lack of such specialists.
UR - http://nacra.net/crj
M3 - Article
VL - 32
JO - Case Research Journal
JF - Case Research Journal
IS - 2
ER -