“Black and Jewish: Double Consciousness Inspired a Qualitative Interactional Approach that Centers Race, Marginality and Justice”

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Classic theoretical arguments by seven Black and Jewish sociologists—informed by their experience of “double-consciousness”—comprise an important legacy in sociology. Approaches that ignore the role of racism and slavery in the rise of Western societies suppress and distort this legacy in favor of a White Christian Hero narrative. By contrast, Durkheim, a Jewish sociologist, took Roman enslaved and immigrant guild-workers as a starting point, positing the “constitutive practices” of their occupations as media of cooperation for achieving solidarity across diversity. His argument marks a transition from the treatment of social facts as durable symbolic residue in homogeneous cultures, to the qualitative study of constitutive social fact making in interaction in diverse social situations. Because making social facts in interaction requires mutual reciprocity, troubles occur frequently in contexts of inequality. Like W.E.B. DuBois, who first theorized double consciousness as a heightened awareness produced by racial exclusion, Harold Garfinkel looked to troubles experienced by the marginalized as clues to the taken-for-granted practices for making social order, calling them “ethno-methods.” Together with other Black and Jewish sociologists—Eric Williams, Oliver Cromwell Cox, Erving Goffman, and Harvey Sacks—they challenge popular interpretations of classical social theory, center Race and marginality, and explain how features of practice that unite/divide can be both interactional and institutionalized.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)163-198
JournalQualitative Sociology
Issue numberVolume 46(2)
StatePublished - 2023

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of '“Black and Jewish: Double Consciousness Inspired a Qualitative Interactional Approach that Centers Race, Marginality and Justice”'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this