TY - JOUR
T1 - Can platform competition support market segmentation? Network externalities versus matching efficiency in equity crowdfunding markets
AU - Gal-Or, Ronen
AU - Gal-Or, Ronen
AU - Penmetsa, Nabita
PY - 2019
Y1 - 2019
N2 - We investigate whether, in spite of the existence of cross-market network externalities, platform competition can lead to segmentation of the two sides of the market served by the platforms. We address this question in the context of competition between two equity crowdfunding platforms that connect startups looking for capital with prospective investors. Given the heterogeneity in the populations of startups and investors in terms of the riskiness of the former population and the degree of risk aversion of the latter population, we investigate whether there exists an equilibrium where the two populations are segmented to ensure an improved match between them. We find that the segmenting equilibrium can arise only when compatibility in terms of their risk profiles is of high importance to both populations, and compatibility is significantly more important than the size of the network externality considered by startups. Segmentation is likely to improve the welfare of both populations when the basic benefit from any kind of match is relatively high.
AB - We investigate whether, in spite of the existence of cross-market network externalities, platform competition can lead to segmentation of the two sides of the market served by the platforms. We address this question in the context of competition between two equity crowdfunding platforms that connect startups looking for capital with prospective investors. Given the heterogeneity in the populations of startups and investors in terms of the riskiness of the former population and the degree of risk aversion of the latter population, we investigate whether there exists an equilibrium where the two populations are segmented to ensure an improved match between them. We find that the segmenting equilibrium can arise only when compatibility in terms of their risk profiles is of high importance to both populations, and compatibility is significantly more important than the size of the network externality considered by startups. Segmentation is likely to improve the welfare of both populations when the basic benefit from any kind of match is relatively high.
UR - https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jems.12286
U2 - 10.1111/jems.12286
DO - 10.1111/jems.12286
M3 - Article
VL - 28
JO - Journal of Economics & Management Strategy
JF - Journal of Economics & Management Strategy
IS - Issue 3
ER -