TY - JOUR
T1 - The Complicated Relationship of Disability and Well-Being
AU - Campbell, Stephen
AU - Stramondo, Joseph A.
PY - 2017
Y1 - 2017
N2 - It is widely assumed that disability is typically a bad thing for those who are disabled. Our purpose in this essay is to critique this view and defend a more nuanced picture of the relationship between disability and well-being. We first examine four interpretations of the above view and argue that it is false on each interpretation. We then ask whether disability is thereby a neutral trait. Our view is that most disabilities are neutral in one sense, though we cannot make simple generalizations about disability’s relationship to well-being in other important senses. After defending this view, we discuss its practical implications for selective abortion for disability, nondisabled people’s interactions with disabled people, and the use of QALYs in health policy.
AB - It is widely assumed that disability is typically a bad thing for those who are disabled. Our purpose in this essay is to critique this view and defend a more nuanced picture of the relationship between disability and well-being. We first examine four interpretations of the above view and argue that it is false on each interpretation. We then ask whether disability is thereby a neutral trait. Our view is that most disabilities are neutral in one sense, though we cannot make simple generalizations about disability’s relationship to well-being in other important senses. After defending this view, we discuss its practical implications for selective abortion for disability, nondisabled people’s interactions with disabled people, and the use of QALYs in health policy.
UR - http://www.academia.edu/29566656/The_Complicated_Relationship_of_Disability_and_Well-Being_Kennedy_Institute_of_Ethics_Journal_forthcoming_
M3 - Article
VL - 27
SP - 151
EP - 184
JO - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal
JF - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal
ER -